The Gospel According to Mark Chapter 2
Originally posted Friday, February 8, 2008
General Comment: Please
note that we have added the Matthew location for each of Mark's passages. It
may be of help to look at both of the passages and compare them to see how
Matthew uses and/or alters Mark's version. Changes were made to correct Mark's
errors, to clarify scenes, and to adapt the material to the situations
and evangelistic ministry of Matthew's community. You will note
that the tone of debate and level of disputes between Jesus and the religious
leadership are stronger and more acrimonious than in Mark. Although there
was persecution of Mark's community, it was not of the same type or intensity
as for Matthew's.
Mark Chapter 2:1-12 Healing a Paralytic Man [MT 9:2-8]
By comparing the
original story in Mark with Matthew notice how Matthew has shortened it to
center on the conflict with the Pharisees. In Mark's more developed version we
find Jesus at home in Capernaum with part of the crowd in the house and
the rest spilling out into the courtyard. Jesus is "speaking the word
to them," the word being the good news of the Reign of God being at hand.
Outside four men carrying a paralyzed man on a makeshift
stretcher approach the house. There are so many people crowding at the
door that they cannot bring their friend inside to be healed by Jesus. In a
move that Jesus will count as an amazing display of faith, the men find
some netting lines, climb the outside ladder to the roof, remove a
portion of the reed-thatch clay roofing and slowly let the man down to the
floor on the mat supported by the lines. Seeing that the men had overcome
two obstacles to their desire to help their friend, the crowd and the roof,
Jesus says to the man, "Son, your sins are
forgiven." He does so not because of anything the man said but because of
the faith of his friends who overcame the obstacles, believing Jesus could help
him.
The Scribes who were
present consider such an action as blasphemy, where blasphemy means saying or
doing anything that lessens the status of God's power or character in the eyes
of others. "Who can forgive sins but the One God," they say among
themselves (Ps.
130:4; Isa. 43:25; 44:22). Notice the term "the One
God." The Scribes are thinking of the great Israelite Creed, the Shema of Deut. 6:4,
"Hear, O Israel the Lord; the Lord our God is One." It is this
sovereignty of God that they hear being challenged by Jesus who presumes upon
God's authority by forgiving the man's sins.
Jesus proceeds to
demonstrate that he does indeed have authority, God's authority, to forgive
sins. The man has been lying on his mat without moving. Jesus tells him to
stand up, pick up his mat and go home, which the man promptly does to the
amazement of the crowd, and no doubt the sullenly silent Scribes. In Jewish
thought of Jesus time there was a causal relationship between sin and
sickness (Ps. 107:17-18;
Deut. 28:27ff). That relationship was always seen in
light of the connection between forgiveness and healing. In the early
Church this latter connection had already been made in the rite of
baptism (and the Eucharist), an understanding inherited from Judaism. Since
Jesus was understood to be present in a persons baptism and in the
Eucharist, it was an easy step to believe that Jesus could forgive sins.
However we
understand the Biblical connections, we can appreciate the power of forgiveness
as an agent of healing and reconciliation. We humans are a sensitive lot. We
are easily offended and hurt. We tend to wear our hurt like a badge and we are
quick to polish it in front of others. Worn long enough it can make
us ill. Wouldn't we feel better, relieved in mind and
soul, if we had enough trust in ourselves to overcome
obstacles of our own making and forgive the offender? There are those
times in my life when I wish someone would come along and say to me,
"Stand up, take up your mat and go home."
Mark Chapter 2:13-17 Jesus Calls Levi [MT 9:9-13]
In Matthew's version
Levi is called Matthew. Even though Mark introduces Levi as the son of
Alphaeus, he does not show up in Mark's list of the twelve disciples. A James,
son of Alphaeus, does along with a Matthew. Levi does not reappear in Mark
after this cameo role. Since Matthew is also a Toll Collector and is mentioned
among the twelve in Mark, Matthew and Luke while Levi is not,
we might conclude that Levi and Matthew are the same person and that
the name change took place to avoid the Jewish criticism associated
with having a disciple who was a descendent of a member of the
Levitical Priesthood (the Tribe of Levi made up that Priesthood). There are a
number of variations on this theme and none of them bear the stamp of history.
Note that Matthew
copies this passage almost word for word. In Jesus' reaction to the Pharisees
criticism that he eats with tax collectors and sinners, Matthew adds
9:13, "Go and learn what this means, 'I desire mercy, not
sacrifice.'"
Mark Chapter 2:18-22 A Question About Fasting [MT 9:14-17]
There is no
important difference between the Markan and Matthean versions of this story. In
verse 18 Mark mentions the "disciples of the Pharisees." Matthew
removes this since Pharisees were a religious party in which a person had
membership, not individuals who would attract disciples. Hillel and Shammai (a
contemporary of Jesus) have been called Pharisees because they founded
two great schools of Torah interpretation. They would be better known as Sages
or Holy Men, unassociated with any religious party.
Mark Chapter 2:23-28 Lord of the Sabbath [MT 12:1-8]
Matthew generally
follows Mark's wording. He removes the name of the High Priest, Abiathar. His
father, Ahimelech, was the High Priest (1 Sam. 21:1-6). Matthew adds
the comment that the Priests of the Temple work on the Sabbath, and something
(the Reign of God) greater than the Temple is involved in Jesus' work. Both
Matthew and Mark mention that David's companions shared in the eating of the
altar bread. According to 1
Sam. 21 the companions were not with David nor
did they share the bread. David told the High priest he wanted the bread for
himself and his companions but that was his way of getting all five loaves for
himself. In later Jewish and early Christian literature there was a tendency to
"smooth out" David's many flaws.
Jesus' closing
comment that the Sabbath was made for humanity and not humanity for the
Sabbath, reflects the understanding of Gen. 2:1-3. It is not because
humanity was created before the Sabbath, but that Sabbath is a gift from God to
humanity.
No comments:
Post a Comment