The Gospel According to Mark Chapter 8
Originally posted Monday, February 18, 2008
Mark Chapter 8:1-9 Feeding the 4,000 [MT
15:32-39]
This is the second
miracle of distribution of bread, with an outline similar to MK 6:30-44. There are minor differences
such as 4,000 instead of the previous 5,000 people; 7 loaves instead of 5
loaves and 2 fish; 7 baskets of fragments instead of 12; here Jesus takes the
initiative to point out the need to feed the people while previously it was the
disciples who wanted to send the people away.
Perhaps the most
significant difference is the location. In MK 6:30-44 Jesus and the disciples are in Galilee, following
the visit to Nazareth and the disciples' mission tour. Before our present
passage Jesus had completed a journey to Tyre in Gentile territory,
then taking a rather circuitous route by way of Sidon to the north, he
came to the region of the Decapolis, also Gentile territory.
The importance of
the two locations for Mark and Matthew, one occurring in Jewish and
the second in Gentile territory, is found in what is being portrayed. The
miraculous abundance of food for so many is a feature of the Messianic age
which is yet to arrive, but which, in the writers' view, has already begun in
and with Jesus ministry. There is not only enough food for the
crowd to be satisfied before their journey home, there are baskets full of
leftovers. The Greek word used here for basket is for a large mat basket, big
enough to hold a person (Acts 9:25).
The heart of both stories is that Jesus makes the Messianic age available
to all people, to both Jew and Gentile, with no discrimination. As there will
be wholeness in body in the age to come, their will also be an abundance of
food beyond imagination. It is easy to understand these passages
together as a parable in which the unexpected lesson is that there
will be seats at the table for all, Jew and Gentile alike. In Paul's
Epistle to the Galatians we will read the theological foundation for
this expected future.
The expectation of
equality for all people is not new with either Paul or the writers of the
Gospels. It is rooted in the Biblical understanding of how God relates to
humanity as revealed in the life of Jesus. The word is "Hesed" which
brings together two attitudes of God acting toward us: love and kindness, often
combined in God's loving kindness and faithfulness. In Judaism and
the more ancient religion of Israel, the components of Hesed are
compassion, mercy, justice, faithfulness and love, not only how God
acts toward us but how we in turn are to act toward others. It is the
Golden Rule and two great commandments to love God and neighbor combined.
It is the ideal world view of Isaiah and other prophets. It is the sum and
substance of Jesus' understanding of what it means to live in God's Kingdom,
under God's Reign now. It is not how the world will be in some hypothetical
future, but how it can begin to work already. As Christians, this is an
enterprise worth our best and most dedicated efforts. Wherever and
whenever the Church can be clearly differentiated from the society in
which it works, the beginning has come upon us.
Mark Chapter 8:10-13 Demand for a Sign [MT 16:1-5]
After Jesus had sent
the people away, he and the disciples left the area and went by boat to the
region of Dalmanutha. Unfortunately such a place does not appear in any
literature from that time nor in any archeological journals. Some manuscripts
have changed the name to Mageda or Magdala, neither of which fit well. All we
can know from Mark's description of the journey is that it would have
been on the western shore of the Sea of Galilee, and in Jewish
territory ,based on the boat having sailed from the eastern
shore and Pharisees being at the boat's destination. Most
commentators on Mark recognize he is somewhat geographically challenged.
In Matthew there are
two passages in which the religious authorities ask Jesus for a sign of his
authority, once a sign from him and a second time a sign from heaven (from
God). In both instances part of Jesus' answer involves the sign of Jonah.
(see MT 12:38ff comments).
Mark does not mention Jonah and Jesus simply tells the Pharisees there will be
no sign given to this [evil and adulterous] generation. Such a response is not
because there is anything wrong with humans asking for a sign from God.
There are a number of Old Testament examples of such requests (Gideon,
Hezekiah) . But in this case, Jesus knows it is a "testing" which
usually is rooted in hostility. Signs can be either earthly (miracles
such as healing) or cosmic events (sky, planets, etc.). Of course,
any number of Jesus' miracles would have provided all the signs they needed.
Jesus' answer addressed to those who are part of this "evil and adulterous
generation" is not that no sign will be given. Of course for
Mark the critical sign of Jesus' authority has already been
given - God's voice in the anointing of Jesus at his baptism, and they
would not accept it. Mark's point of view is that no matter what signs or
miracles are given, the Pharisees and other leaders will not accept anything
for they deny any possibility that Jesus' authority is from God.
We might ask
ourselves if we are part of the same generation as were the Pharisees. Do we
require signs that Jesus has authority to speak to this world or to us and
through us to the world? What kind of sign would we want to be convinced that
Jesus speaks for God, or that God spoke and acted through Jesus in an
authoritative way? Are there signs all around us and we just don't get it? Do
we live in such a desacralized world that the sacramental nature of Grace
cannot be seen and, to use Dr. Gene Zimmerman's term, the "Holy
Presence" cannot be discerned? We might ask ourselves...we might.
Mark Chapter 8:14-21 The Yeast of the Pharisees and of
Herod [MT 16:5-12]
Matthew has replaced
the yeast of Herod with that of the Sadducees knowing that the Herodians would
not be in any religious agreement with the Pharisees. However neither would the
Sadducees who rejected the very idea of the Pharisees' oral traditions. The word
yeast is a mistranslation of the Greek text which uses the word for
leaven. Yeast is from a single celled fungi and was rare in Jesus
time. Leaven is left over fermented dough used as a starter for a new
batch of bread. It was considered as symbolic of "creeping
corruption" or decay because it could permeate the whole of the dough and
cause it to rise, just as a little evil can permeate the whole person and
turn him/her toward wickedness. Nothing containing leaven could be placed
as a cereal offering on the Temple altar. During the seven days of
Passover there can be no leaven in a Jewish household. In early Christian
thought, leaven was associated with the corruption of the Old (evil) Age
in which the Church existed. In baptism all the leaven of that age was
removed in preparation for the age to come.
In this passage the
disciples are discussing having only one barley loaf with them on the boat, a
rather astonishing discovery, having just recently picked up seven basketfuls
of bread scraps. Jesus hears them and warns them about the leaven of the
Pharisees and Herod, which they misunderstand. They think he is talking
about not having any bread. Jesus marvels at their incomprehension of the
lesson (teaching) of just who this Jesus is, taught in the recent
feeding of the four thousand (the number of baskets is not relevant to the
meaning of this passage). Unlike Matthew, Mark has no closing comment
explaining that Jesus was talking about the teaching of the Pharisees, that
just a small amount of their teaching, like leaven, could creep in and quickly
spread its corrupting influence. For Mark as well as Matthew there was a need
to warn their respective communities of the corruption which might arise from
the "contamination" brought by false teachers and prophets who urged
a return to Jewish traditions as a requirement for being a Christian. In
"Galatians" and "Philippians" Paul warns against such
corrupting influences from the Church in Jerusalem.
Mark Chapter 8:22-26 The Blind Man of Bethsaida [MT
has no parallel passage]
This passage is much
like the healing of the deaf mute (MK
7:31-37) and the blind Bartimaeus of Jericho (MK 10:46-51). These three passages taken together are often
understood and used in preaching as parables about Jesus' opening the ears
and eyes of the spiritually deaf and blind, which for Mark frequently includes
the disciples from whom Jesus works to remove the leaven of imperceptions.
Mark would also want us to understand these miracles to be in keeping with God
working in Jesus in accordance with Isaiah
35:5-6 which looks forward to the new age of God's Reign and
Jesus' role in bringing that Reign about. The stories also serve the theme of
restoration. For this blind man, who had to be led by someone everyplace he
needed to go, now can be independent and go where he wishes.
The two step healing
of this blind man speaks to the process sometimes necessary to bring persons to
belief in who Jesus is. The situating of this passage immediately before
Peter's confession of faith, albeit not quite a completely mature faith,
indicates this parabolic meaning. As noted previously the use of saliva as
a curative was well known in Greek and Roman as well as Jewish healing.
We are all
acquainted with the maturing nature of faith. Whatever a mature faith looks
like, it is certain we are not born into the Church through confirmation or any
other way with such a faith. John Wesley, the spiritual father of
Methodism, taught about the work of Grace in our lives. The Prevenient Grace of
God draws us to Christ. The Saving Grace of God draws us into the fellowship of
the Church. The Sanctifying Grace of God then guides us through
progressively more mature stages of faith. Wesley preached and wrote about
going on to perfection. Although I have never met anyone who has reached such a
stage, I understand his meaning in the possibility of an ongoing spiritual
growth by attention to our faith and taking the opportunity to nourish
that faith by all means possible. It is part of our lives that leaves much to
be desired in this busy age. The Church serves us well when it can offer a
wide range of growth opportunities, in Sunday classes and other
learning situations, small groups and serving ministries. It
doesn't fit the Biblical view of faith to say we have achieved the
top.
For those interested
in the stages of faith I recommend James Fowler's books, Stages
of Faith: The Psychology of Human Development and Becoming
Adult, Becoming Christian : Adult Development and Christian Faith.
Mark Chapter 8:27-30 Peter's Confession of Faith [MT
16:13-20]
Matthew
has significantly expanded Mark's version of this passage. He has used the
basic confession around which he writes about the Church with respect
to its establishment upon the Apostolic heritage and its
authority as the legitimate inheritor of the keys to the Kingdom of God, the
gate through which one must pass to enter.
Mark is the one who
sets the scene in Gentile territory, Caesarea Philippi, an appropriate place in
the heart of the Roman frontier. It is here that Peter's confession
of faith is made, as if shouting it out in a rejection of the Roman
penchant for deifying its Emperors as Lords and Saviors of the world. The
question Jesus asks, "Who do you say that I am?" is the one important
question we all must answer. Our answer probably will not be
"Messiah" for such a title is too laden with the baggage of the first
century. We may use other titles as metaphors for an insight into what Jesus
may mean to our lives and what authority we believe he has to speak to us
in this modern age. Regardless of the answer, an answer is necessary, and the
answer must be our own.
Mark Chapter 8:31-9:1 Jesus Predicts His Death and
Resurrection [MT 16:21-28]
Matthew has used
essentially all of Mark's passage unchanged. Of interest is vs. 9:1 in
Mark. Note that Matthew writes as a future event that some who are
hearing Jesus "...will not taste death before they see the Son of Man
coming in his Kingdom." Mark's original, however, is present tense.
Those that are hearing Jesus "...will not taste death until they see that
the Kingdom of God has come
with power." The difference is important. Matthew, writing in about 85 CE
is more conscious of the delay of Jesus' return. He places that return within
the lifetime of his community, a dilemma faced by each generation of the Church
ever since, leading to an endless stream of predictions and books
about the end of this age. Mark asserts that the Kingdom has already come,
if only in part. How those with Jesus will see that it has already come is not
altogether clear. Perhaps this refers to the Transfiguration in MK 9:2-6. The use of
"has" precludes the possibility that the coming of the Kingdom
relates to the crucifixion and/or resurrection or Jesus' expected return.
Perhaps we would not
be to far from an understanding of this mystery if we would see all of the
events of Jesus' ministry, as portrayed in Mark, as examples of that Kingdom
being already present. The Kingdom is beginning because taken together all
of those events are understood by Mark to represent the presence of
God at work in the world though Jesus. If God is at work in Jesus, then God's
Kingdom, God's Reign, has indeed already begun. The citizens may be small in
number, a few disciples here, a few there, but there none the less; with each
added disciple, each new believer, the Kingdom advances. We are not meant to be
concerned about times and hours. We are part of the advancement, supported by
the foundation already laid for nearly 2000 years. It is our turn to keep that
foundation spreading. In our lifetime perhaps what we do will help others see
that, indeed, God's Reign has already come.
No comments:
Post a Comment