The Gospel According to Mark Chapter 13
Originally posted Monday, February 25, 2008
General Comment: Chapter 13 in
Mark has been named the Little Apocalypse. With the exception of a few passages
in Paul's epistles, this is the oldest example of New Testament
Apocalyptic writing. The only other, and much larger, such writing is the Book
of Revelation which is entirely Apocalyptic in nature. Such writings seek to
describe the signs which foretell the end of the old age and the beginning
of the new. In Jewish Apocalyptic writings the new age is ushered in by the
Davidic Messiah or Son of Man. In Christian writings - and there are many, it
is the Parousia, the return of Christ, variously as one of
peace, judge or a mighty warrior who wreaks havoc on the earth (Revelation).
Such books appear throughout history at regular intervals and are the stuff of
more fictional accounts than one can wish to count. They all have in
common a perception that God will save the particular religious group in
peril (Judaism, Islam or Christianity) from devastating persecution or
destruction by its enemies - in Christianity, the Antichrist. One interesting
example, and typical of the genre, is the Apocalypse of Pseudo Methodius
written toward the end of the seventh century in response to the threat of
Islam - the advances of the sons if Ishmael into the Byzantine world.
See the notes for
Matthew Chapter 24 for additional information on Apocalyptic literature.
Mark Chapter 13:1-13 The Prediction and Signs of
the Destruction of the Temple [see MT 24:1-14]
Matthew closely
follows Mark in the entire chapter. When the disciples marvel at the buildings
and stones of the Temple structures, they are not exaggerating. Descriptions
from Josephus who was a General in the Jewish-Roman war, wrote about
the beauty and enormity of the Temple. Excavations during the last forty
years have verified much of what he wrote. In the wall, building stones with
dimensions of eighteen feet long by five feet wide by six feet high, weighing
400 tons, have been unearthed, and these are the small ones. Josephus reports
that not even the Roman battering rams could penetrate the outer western wall.
The finishing stones on buildings were polished and gleamed in the sunlight.
The opening passage
follows the collective direction of the events beginning with Jesus' entry into
Jerusalem. In Particular Mark's portrayal of the two fig tree scenes bracketing
the long Temple sequence prepare us for what follows.
As the disciples
stand in awe of the sights, Jesus quickly changes the mood. As a word of
judgment Jesus tells the disciples that the time is coming when all this
magnificence will be thrown down. As Mark writes the last portions of his
version of the Gospel the Romans are methodically moving through Palestine
overcoming scattered armed groups of Zealots in Galilee, the Essenes in their
desert community of Qumran and the decreasing remnants of the Jewish
forces led by Josephus. Their target is Jerusalem and they will make a lesson
of it that is mourned even to this day. Josephus will enter Jerusalem and
attempt to convince the leaders of the Zealots who have taken control of the
city to surrender and save the city and the Temple. They will refuse, waiting
expectantly on the ramparts for the Messiah to appear on the Mount of Olives with
his angelic forces streaming across the Kidron valley to intervene on behalf of
God's people. But it will not happen. Jesus, with the memory of Jeremiah before
him, sees the outcome as inevitable as it was six centuries before when the
Prophet lamented over the impending destruction of the city by the
Babylonians.
But when will this
happen? What will the signs be, the disciples ask Jesus as they look down
from the Mount of Olives opposite the Temple. What follows is from the
well known, generic language of apocalyptic vision, used in writings
(Enoch, Esdras, Baruch, Revelation) before and after the time of Jesus. He
would have known such language and its use, not as history but as vision.
False Messiahs and Prophets, wars, famines and natural disasters, all will
happen, but don't be led astray. This is only the beginning.
There will be
persecution, your persecution, he says to them. You will stand before
Synagogues, councils and kings as a testimony to me. Give voice to the
Good News without fear. Families will fracture in acts of betrayal. Many will
die, but many will remain faithful no matter the trials.
Mark Chapter 13:14-23 The Desolating Sacrilege [see
MT 24:15-28]
It is difficult to
identify the Desolating Sacrilege with any particular object or person in
Mark's time. Caligula attempted to have a statue of himself placed in the
Temple Sanctuary, but died before that could happen. There was no attempt by
Claudius or Nero to disrupt the Temple or impose any such pagan representation
upon the Jews. Since Mark may be writing just before the end of the Jewish war,
it would be most logical to look at the events of the period 67-70 CE. There
were false Messiahs in the period preceding the Jerusalem destruction,
such as Theudas with 400 followers and The Egyptian with some 30,000. Both
were destroyed by the Romans. The strongest possibility may be the
Galilean Menahem ben Judah who was the leader of the Zealots- basically a
collection of terrorists who despised the Roman rule of Palestine and who
refused to pay the Roman head tax, shouting, "No king but God!" He
had a number of early successes against the Romans and their Herodian
allies. He captured Masada and then routed the garrison in the Antonia Tower
adjacent to the Temple. He (and the Zealots) took control of the city and
Temple, acting as its king. He was eventually murdered by another Zealot,
Eleazar and his men.
It was during this
period of Zealot control that we can reasonably suggest the desecration of the
Temple, not by Romans, but by the bloodshed in the city and Temple as groups
fought for control and High Priests were murdered. The Temple certainly had
become a literal den of brigands.
We might ask why
Mark would use these events in writing for his community of mostly Gentiles.
Perhaps it was to demonstrate a sense solidarity between those Gentiles
who had undergone the terrible persecutions of Nero for the last four
years since the great fire of 64 CE in Rome. It was out of this
persecution that the apocalyptic vision of Mark was born.
Mark Chapter 13:24-27 The Coming of the son of Man [see
MT 24:29-31]
Mark draws upon the
cosmic imagery of Isaiah, Ezekiel and Joel. The signs are representative of the
appearance of a divine figure. In Mark it is the Son of Man, the final
Judge. The sign the disciples ask for is not found in these atmospheric
events but in the appearance of the "Son of Man coming in the
clouds," an image drawn from Daniel
7:13.
This is the defining
event for the earliest Church. It is more pronounced than the "Second
coming of Christ" which is later terminology when the 'Son of Man"
and "Messiah" titles eventually fade as major titles
applied to Jesus. The idea of the final judgment, a Jewish apocalyptic concept
that pre-dates the church, became an important part of Christian
thinking as they considered the fate of all of those who rejected the Gospel or
who lapsed in their faith.
Mark Chapter 13:28-31 The Lesson of the Fig Tree [see
MT 24:32-35]
The fig tree of this
passage is not the one representing the condemned Temple. This is a brief
proverb about the changing of seasons. Mark uses it as a comparison
to reading the signs previously mentioned. "These things" are those
events presented in Mark
13:1-23.
vss. 30-31 present
significant difficulties for interpreters. Are "all these things" the
same as in vs. 29 or is
this an independent parabolic saying from an early Christian prophet? Is it the
hope of the Church that they will see the Son of Man, to whom all these things
point, appear in their own lifetime? We can say with assurance that the son of
Man did not come to usher in the final judgment, at least not in the way Mark
understood such an event. That the early church did look forward to
an swift return of Jesus is evident in one of Paul's epistles twenty
years before Mark's Gospel was finished. We must look elsewhere for an
understanding.
We have mentioned
the understanding that the Kingdom of God had already begun to dawn in the
presence and ministry of Jesus, the one in and through whom God
works in the world. For Mark that beginning will come to its fulfillment in the
death of Jesus, for it is in Jesus' death and exaltation that Mark sees the
coming of the Son of Man, in great glory and power (vs. 26). In effect and paradoxically, it is in this shame of the
cross that the glory and power of the Son of God are exhibited and released
into the world, specifically within the community of faith, the new Israel, the
Church. The generation of the cross had not passed away before it saw
these things transpire, before they had experienced the New Age of the
risen Christ. The generation of Mark also saw these things through the
preaching, teaching and the sacraments of the Church. Yet even then, Mark
writes, there is more to do. The Gospel must be preached to the ends of
the Earth before all the world will "see" what the Church has already
experienced.
Mark Chapter 13:32-36 Watchfulness [see MT 24:36,
44]
This passage is
something of a corrective or caution to the obsession ("irrational
exuberance," to borrow a bit of Alan Greenspan-speak) of those who traffic
in End Time predictions and who are able to convince audiences decade after
decade to contribute to their cause or buy their latest books based on the
latest predictions, no matter how strange they seem. In the 19th century
the Millerites, as many as 100,000 people including some Methodists, were
convinced that Jesus' return (his second advent) would come on October 22,
1844 (a final date after previous predictions had not worked out). Apparently
the careful calculations of William Miller were incorrect. Unfortunately
many had sold farms, homes and businesses in the belief that Miller was
correct. Out of that movement came a number of Adventist groups, including the
largest, the Seventh Day Adventists, which formed in 1863, which might be proof
enough that Paul was right: God can work for good in all things.
In the first century
the Pharisees believed they could hurry the advent of God's Kingdom by teaching
enough Jews to practice the traditions of holiness. However, For Mark that
final day of the universal presence of the Kingdom cannot be hurried, forced or
predicted. Therefore, watchfulness is necessary, not calculations. As in
the days of Noah when all things were occurring as usual, the flood struck
and no one knew it was coming until it came. So it is with the Son of Man. Only
God knows the day and the hour.
No comments:
Post a Comment