Galatians Chapter 4
Monday August 18, 2008
General Comment: Paul
has written that Christ is the singular offspring of Abraham
and therefore the recipient of the God's Covenant promise and blessing. It
follows that all who "belong to Christ" and are "in
Christ" (believers) are also, by faith, recipients. We are Abraham's
offspring and heirs of the promise. Genesis defines this covenant/promise/blessing
in terms of the multitude of Abraham's descendants and the "promised
land." In later history the land was the Kingdom
of Israel established to its greatest extent during the reign of King
David. This was considered the Golden Age. To the Israelites this was the
ideal fulfillment of God's blessing and promise. Out of this grew the
prophetic declaration of God's promise of the perpetual existence of the
Davidic ancestral throne. There would always be an Israel and there would
always be a King of the lineage of David. Of course, as history shows,
this only lasted until 587 BCE when the line of David disappeared in the
Babylonian exile. From then on, during and after the exile, the hope of
regaining this ideal Kingdom was kept alive. There were various understandings
of the re-emergence of the Kingdom to its former splendor. Most involved God
working within history by raising up a new King to sit on David's throne.
Some involved God's final intervention in a more cosmic sense in which God
becomes the King who wipes away all enemies of Israel and establishes a
new Israel as a Kingdom of justice, peace and plenty. The hope that this
Kingdom would soon arrive became a central feature of Jewish Theology
and was adopted and adapted by early Christianity.
For Paul
Christ was the one who had already begun to establish this
Kingdom. Belief in Christ became its point of entry. To believe in
Christ through faith was to become "Abraham's offspring, heirs [to the
Kingdom] according to the promise."
Galatians Chapter 4:1-7 The Purpose of the Law Continued
Paul addresses the
Galatians who are being persuaded by "false apostles" to rely on
the law for their justification. Writing of the Jewish experience, he
characterizes the law as serving as a guardian and disciplinarian, a
definer of sin but ineffective as an agent of justification. The law was
incapable of assuring the receiving of the promise. In this
chapter he develops the idea of the heir to the promise. Using the analogy
of an inheritance he writes about the status of the heir. For all
practical purposes the infants are like household slaves. They
may own the father's estate but as long as they are minors under a
guardian and before the appropriate date set by the father, they cannot
possess it. The Jews, who are under the law which could not justify them,
are slaves to the "elemental principles" of the world which he
understands to be Satanic in nature. They could not receive the promised
inheritance of justification until the "fullness of time." That
time, Paul writes, arrived with the appearance in Israel of Christ, the
Son sent by God, "born of a woman...under the law," to bring
justification (redemption) to those under the law (Israel). Those
"children" who believed received the inheritance (justification) from
the Father.
In vs. 5b Paul shifts from the
first bringing of redemption to those under the law to that of
the Galatian Gentiles' experience when they first believed in the
Christ preached by Paul. He interprets the initial sending of the Son and
the offering of redemption to Israel as a necessary precursor to the
mission to the Gentiles. Because they are not children of God in the way the
Israelites are, Paul describes their inclusion in God's family as by adoption.
In confirmation of adoption God has sent the Spirit of Christ through which
they can respond from their hearts, "Abba." So then, the Galatians
are no longer slaves without inheritance. They are children and heirs just as
certain as are those who were under the law and believed.
Galatians Chapter 4:8-20 Paul Chastises the Galatians
Now Paul
reminds the Galatians of the dire situation they were in before
they came to know God. They were "enslaved" to the demonic
nature of what they believed to be pagan gods. Now that they know the true God,
how, he asks, can they succumb to the false gospel delivered by false
apostles and turn their backs on what they have gained in
Christ?" How can they submit themselves again as slaves to the
"elemental spirits" to which those who are still under the law - even
though they call themselves Christians, are enslaved? Here they are, adopting
the useless mandates of the Jewish tradition, keeping special days (Jewish
feast days), months and years, all calculated by the movement of the moon and sun.
We should not lose the force of this startling reproach as Paul actually
equates the Galatians' former practices of worshipping pagan idols with the
celebration of Jewish events! As far as Paul is concerned this is enough to
nullify all the work he has done among them. In effect he thinks he may have
wasted his time.
Paul moves from
chastisement to a plea. He begs them
not to enslave themselves to the practices of Judaism being urged upon
them but to become as he is in the same way he became the same as
they were. In other words, as he has forsaken his Mosaic
holiness practices to live among them as if he were a Gentile, he wants
them to imitate him in his freedom in Christ. Vs. 12b is an indication that the Galatians have not
completely abandoned Paul. They have not "wronged" (rejected) him
yet. When he first preached among the Galatians they readily welcomed and
gladly accepted him as if he were Christ. Even though he was suffering
from a "physical infirmity" (thorn in the flesh) they did not shun him.
So, he asks, what happened to that show of caring hospitality, that eagerness
to have him among them and to hear his message? Have the
false apostles depicted him as their enemy by deprecating the truth
of the Gospel he preached? He charges them with deceitfully trying to flatter
(make much of) the Galatians in order to win them over to their side
against and to reject Paul. If it were possible to be with them he could
stem this rising tide engulfing the Galatians. If he were there he would not be
faced with the prospects of starting all over as their spiritual mother, going
through labor pains again until they returned to the truth of Christ they first
learned from Paul.
Galatians Chapter 4:21-5:1 An Allegory of Hagar and
Sarah
(1) Paul supplies
another example from the Abraham saga to demonstrate the false path to
justification offered by the law. In the story of the birth of Ishmael, son of
Hagar the slave, and Isaac, son of Sarah, a "free woman," he
distinguishes between the two:
(2) Ishmael was born
"according to the flesh ' while Isaac was born according to God's promise
to Abraham.
(3) Fitting the two
women into a rather loose allegory, Hagar represents the covenant of Mount
Sinai "bearing children for slavery" to the Law of Moses.
(4) The reference to slavery to the law is understood in Paul's terms as the law being a dead end on the road to the justification the law cannot provide.
(5) Extending the
allegory further, Hagar is Mount
Sinai and "stands in line with" the present earthly
Jerusalem of Paul's time and she is in slavery with her children.
(6) The allegorical
connection here between Mount Sinai and Jerusalem is found in the similarity of
the rigid demands of the Sinai covenant (Law) and that which is practiced by
the Jews of Jerusalem. The false apostles who have come from Jerusalem to
turn the Galatians away from Paul's freedom in Christ message represent the
Jews of Jerusalem.
(7) However, if
Hagar is the covenant of Mount Sinai whose children are born to slavery under
the law in line with those in the present Jerusalem, the other woman, Sarah, is in
line with the heavenly Jerusalem. "She is free and she is
[Paul's and the Galatians'] mother."
The cited scripture
is from Isa. 54:1 in which
the childless woman is meant to be the barren Sarah. She will
ultimately rejoice at the birth of a son, the child of the promise. The
desolate woman is Hagar whose children are many. One would think Hagar would be
more blessed than Sarah based on the number of children. However her children
are all under the curse of the law while Sarah's son is the bearer of the
promise that ultimately comes through Christ. On another level, Sarah's line
has been far more successful in bringing the Gentiles to God than Hagar's
children under the law, which is the context of the Isaiah quotation.
Paul closes his
argument from scripture reminding the Galatians they are children of the
promise. He points to the false apostle from Jerusalem, equating their
attacks against Paul with Ishmael's harassment of Isaac. Just
as Hagar and Ishmael were driven out with no inheritance, so
these false apostles should be driven out. They are "under the
law" and, their being Christians not withstanding, they have rejected
their inheritance by remaining under the law. Again for emphasis, Paul
affirms the Galatians' entitlement as children of the promise, set
free by Christ to remain free. He exhorts them to "stand firm" and
not to turn away from what they have gained in Christ thereby submitting
"again to a yoke of slavery."
No comments:
Post a Comment