Tuesday, May 13, 2014

May 11, 2014 Romans Chapter 11

Romans Chapter 11

Tuesday, July 1, 2008


Romans Chapter 11:1-10 Israel's Rejection is not Final

Chapters 9 and 10 have dealt with the troubling issue of the rejection of the good news and refusal to be swayed by Paul's (or anybody else's) preaching. He outlines the election of Israel by God and the ready availability of the word regarding righteousness outside the Law as demonstrated in Abraham's experience. Now he must resolve the final issue: Having rejected the Gospel, is Israel's rejection final? His answer is an unequivocal "By no means!" In an artfully crafted argument he looks back into Israel's history to find an example of God's graciousness in a time when Israel was rejecting God and worshipping the Canaanite and other gods, citing Elijah's pleading with God against Israel (1 Kings 19:10). God did not heed Elijah for there was a remnant of seven thousand that had remained faithful. Paul uses this idea of a faithful remnant in Israel to refer to those Jews who had accepted Christianity and been justified (seen as righteous) by faith and not works.

So, the elect (the remnant) obtained the righteousness they were seeking not through the Law but through faith, but the others failed. And why did they fail? Here is Paul's only possible answer that will leave him room to fashion a scenario within which he can avoid accepting the total rejection of Israel by the God who had chosen them as God's people. Using the same text we have seen in the Gospels (Isa. 6:9-10), Paul reasons that their hearts were hardened by God. What God did to Pharaoh, God did to Israel. The reason is yet to unfold.

Romans Chapter 11:11-24 The Salvation of the Gentiles

So their hearts have been hardened by God, causing Israel to reject the Gospel! Has their rejection led to their fall? "By no means," Paul declares. But - and here the resolution begins, their rejection of righteousness through faith in Christ has resulted in salvation for the Gentiles through faith. That righteousness has come to the Gentiles through faith has made Israel jealous even though they, too, had sought righteousness but futilely through works of the Law. Israel's transgression has become a rich benefit for the Gentiles (Paul turned to the Gentiles when he was rejected by the Jews). If Israel's failing has led to such a result, will not the full inclusion of Israel mean much more? Yes, of course.

Paul now turns his attention to the Roman community's Gentiles who, by an amazing outcome of cause and effect, have been justified and have received righteousness through faith by the failure of Israel to obtain it. His purpose is to help the Gentiles to see the true value of Israel as the theological and historical foundation upon which they now stand. He also wants to warn them against any smug sense of superiority as if they have received God's special attention over against the Jews. Paul is the apostle to the Gentiles and he "glorifies" (establishes as being from God) his missionary effort which has led to the jealousy of his own "flesh" (people), some of whom he hopes to save. If their rejection of Christ has led to the reconciliation of [the Gentile] world, Israel's ultimate acceptance of Christ certainly will lead to their eternal life. He does not want the Gentiles to think that they have left the Jews behind and forgotten by God. He wants them to understand that God has welcomed them into a refashioned Israel founded upon God's work through Christ.

Vs. 16 is very difficult to interpret. Using the background of Israel's first fruits offering during the Feast of Weeks (Lev. 23:10; Num.15:17-21), Paul writes (correctly) that when a part of the dough (made from the wheat and barley harvest) is offered to God as the first fruits, the entire mound of dough will be considered as being holy. He uses this understanding as analogous to the root of the olive tree. If the root of the olive tree is holy then its branches are holy. (The olive tree was a symbol of Israel's spiritual history and in the prophets came to be associated with Israel itself.) In the analogy the entire mound of dough and the olive tree branches represent unconverted Israel. The question is, what do the first fruits and root represent? So far in these three chapters Paul has dealt with that part of Israel that has rejected Christ as the agent of justification leading to God's righteousness. But not all have rejected Christ. Paul himself and many other Jews have accepted this gift. In effect they have become the remnant already referred to by Paul in 9:27 citing Isa. 10:22. This remnant is the first fruits already offered to God which makes the entire mound, Israel, holy; but what of the root? Following the analogy of the first fruits, the root must be to the branches (Israel) as the first fruits were to the whole mound of dough (also Israel). Only one choice seems possible: the root is Jesus. Paul will later tell us as much. Jesus is "offered up" to God and so as the foundation stone of the new Israel. As the Messiah he is the holy root that makes the branches holy.

We should be cautious not to read too much into Paul's use of "holy" as referring to unbelieving Israel. He is not proposing that there is no need for accepting Christ through faith that they somehow are grandfathered in because of their history. Rather, they retain a special relationship with God as the original chosen and those whom God wishes to include in the new Israel founded on Christ with other Jews and with Gentiles.

Paul stresses the position of the Gentiles in relation to the Jews. The broken branches are unbelieving Jews whose place has been taken by the Gentiles who are wild olive shoots grafted into the tree. They should not boast or become proud because they have replaced broken branches as if they are now more important than the broken ones. They are still being upheld by others. Further, their place as new branches is only as lasting as their continued faith in God through Christ (no "once saved always saved"). To deny one's faith is to be as the unbelievers, cut off from the tree. Besides, they are wild olive tree shoots grafted into a cultivated olive tree. How much more will God graft the natural branches back into their own tree?

Romans Chapter 11:25-36 All Israel Will Be Saved

Paul returns to his reasoning of 11:7-8 that God has hardened the hearts of part of Israel. God will continue to do so until the "full number" of Gentiles has come in. Paul does not mean some specific period of time nor does he envision that all Gentiles will be converted. His experience has been otherwise. More likely he is thinking of the imminent coming of Christ and the completion of his own mission to Spain which can be considered as the ends of the earth at the straights of Gibraltar beyond which the earth and sea disappear. In any case, he is sure of one thing: all Israel will be saved. Even though they are for now enemies of God they will be saved. God's election cannot be revoked, if even for the sake of the ancestors. The disobedient Gentiles received mercy because the rejection of Christ by unbelieving Jews caused Paul to preach to them. So also, because the Jews' disobedience has brought mercy to the Gentiles - a positive outcome, they too will ultimately receive God's mercy. Thus God, against whom all humanity has sinned, will be merciful to all.


Paul ends with a doxology indicating the end of this section. The wording, from Isa. 40:13recognizes the depth of mystery everyone faces when attempting to put God in a box as if God's actions can be predicted or even understood. The theology of ancient Israel understood that God acted with unbridled power but that power was meant for their good. Be it the strictness of Law or punishment of exile, they believed there was a balance in God's "hesed," God's faithfulness and loving kindness. In the ancient mind, Paul's understanding that God would limit Jewish acceptance of Christ in order that the Gentiles might is perfectly within God's purview. We might think in different terms but in the end, however we try to understand God, to fully understand we would have to be God.

No comments:

Post a Comment