Thursday, May 8, 2014

May 8, 2014 Romans Chapter 7

Romans Chapter 7

Originally posted Thursday, June 26, 2008


Romans Chapter 7:1-6 An Analogy of Marriage

In the previous chapter Paul used the analogy of slavery to differentiate between being a slave to sin which ends in death and being a slave to righteousness which ends in eternal life. Paul uses a second analogy, the bond of marriage under the Law (Torah), to examine the effect of one's death on that bond.  Writing to those who are under the Law, Jewish Christians, struggling with the conflict over the value of Torah, he describes the legal "binding of husband and wife. A woman is bound to her husband as long as he lives. Any other living arrangement would be adulterous. If her husband dies she is free (and encouraged) to remarry. She is free from the Law with regard to the former marriage.

Paul now applies the marriage analogy to the issue of a Christian's relationship to the Law. Using the prior point of a Christian having died with Christ in baptism and having risen to "walk in newness of life" (6:4), he declares (with authority) that in the same way, the Christian has "died to the law." The Christian no longer "belongs" to the Law (as its slave) but belongs to another - to the risen Christ. Belonging to Christ is synonymous with being a slave to righteousness (6:18). Paul reasons that before the Jewish Christian was converted she/he belonged to (was a slave to) the Law and was "living in the flesh." In such a state the Law (which defines sin) "aroused" sinful passions in their flesh (bodies) which bore the fruit of death. Now that they are free from the captivity of the "old written code" they are no longer its slaves. They have passed from death to "new life in the Spirit."

In this passage Paul has introduced two new concepts related to the Christian life. He has mentioned life in the flesh (body) and life in the Spirit. He relates the first to sinfulness - the Law aroused "our sinful passions" which were at work in the flesh. His term "members" means body parts through which sin is expressed and he leaves that to our imaginations. We must be careful to avoid any conclusion that Paul is saying the body is inherently sinful. The body is the conduit for sin. To live in the flesh is to give the body over to any sinful passion that presents itself. He characterizes those who live under the Law as susceptible to such passions. Over against living in and for the flesh is, as an opposing existence, the "new life in the Spirit." He confronts us with two ways to live: in the flesh or in the [Holy] Spirit. In other words, we choose to live carnally or spiritually, guided by sin or guided by God. We serve whatever or whomever we choose.

Romans Chapter 7:7-13 The Law and Sin

Paul restates his argument about the nature of the Law. He asks if the Law should be considered as sin. Of course not! The Law has brought knowledge of sin not sin itself. If some action is not in the Law it is not sin, or at least is not understood to be sin. He gives the example of the sin of covetousness (to desire wrongfully without regard for the rights of others - Exod. 20:17). If there were no commandment in the Law against coveting, it would not be a sin to covet. If there were no speed limit signs we could not break the law no matter how fast we drove. The law is a big red sign of what actions are wrong. "Apart from the Law sin lies dead." We cannot push this analogy too far but Paul's meaning is obvious. For Paul, Sin takes on a life all its own. Sin is operative, seeking opportunity through the Law to infect those whose allegiances are poorly chosen. This is in keeping with his view of two worlds or kingdoms in conflict, that of God and that of Satan, the father of sin.

Returning to his original question of whether or not the Law is sin, he declares it to be holy (it is of God), just and good. So, he asks, did this good Law bring death? Of course not! In a variation on a theme he suggests that sin, acting through what is good - the Law, brought death. So far we might see his point: Sin acts through the Law as an opportunist to tempt and to lead astray. In vs. 13b we seem to have a contradiction. Is he saying that Sin worked through the Law so that it could or would be seen as sin? Probably not. More likely he is suggesting that Sin took advantage of the good commandment through human weakness and this shows just how terrible sin is. He still maintains that the commandment shows what sin is and the reality that sin works through the holy, just and good commandment multiplies sin's malevolence.

Romans Chapter 7:14-25 The Inner Conflict

What Paul has proposed is that sin and commandment are in conflict within each of us. We strive to act rightly but we end up messing up. In what at first appears to be a bit of brilliant rationalization, Paul declares that it isn't he who is acting wrongly it is the Sin that dwells within his body that is acting wrongly. How else can he explain his desire to do what is right when the outcome is always wrong?  Obviously, he admits, nothing good [there is no good that] dwells in his body (not literally in his body but in his "self." (In Aramaic, flesh and blood constitutes the self, the whole person). Even if he wills what is good he cannot seem to achieve the good.  He characterizes the Sin that dwells within him as another Law at work in opposition to the Law of God in which he delights in his mind (thinking). It is this "other Law" that holds him captive to the law of Sin.

Here Paul's shout is an expression of the Jewish convert's frustration. His conversation has been with a "fictitious Jewish Christian" (not unlike himself) who has to reconcile the idea of switching his deepest allegiance from the Law of Moses to the Law of Christ, from the old way of understanding the source of salvation (obedience to the Law) to the new (Obedience to Christ). With these forces battling within him, who will rescue him from death? Who will save him?


Thankfully God has provided the remedy. Resolution comes paradoxically in accepting the conflict as real and continuing. There is no possibility of absolute obedience to either pole. Such is the case with any legal code. We dance between two partners each inviting our attention. With Paul and in our minds, we commit ourselves to the Law of God through Christ while accepting that another Law will persistently tug at the weak edges of our senses. There are no easy answers, no happy-face solutions to the human dilemma. There are just choices to be made at every turn while allowing our choices to be informed and guided by a call from beyond our selves.

No comments:

Post a Comment